Home   News   Article

Quarry near Huntly is approved by councillors but villagers vow to continue fight against it





Plans for a giant 30 acre quarry near Huntly have been approved – but “devastated” villagers refuse to give up the fight against it.

Leiths (Scotland) will operate the quarry, which is estimated to be the same size as 15 football pitches, for the next 22 years.

Locals have vowed to continue the fight against the Craig Farm quarry.
Locals have vowed to continue the fight against the Craig Farm quarry.

The site at Craig Farm is believed to hold around 650,000 tonnes of gravel and sand, with 30,000 tonnes of materials to be extracted and sold per year.

Once extracted, the material would be washed and screened at an onsite processing plant before being taken away by lorry.

Sand from the site will be used to create asphalt for road surfacing and ready mixed concrete.

Excavation works at the quarry is expected to be carried out in phases, with each area to be restored once it is no longer needed.

The Aberdeen-based firm said the Craig Farm site would employ two members of staff, with a third expected to assist with haulage.

Ahead of the crucial meeting, council planners had recommended the plan be granted.

They believed the quarry was “appropriately sited and designed”, and claimed it would not harm the surrounding landscape or listed buildings.

And, they said the giant facility would not affect air quality, create unacceptable noise or create road safety issues.

Leiths estimates there would be an average of 11 HGV trips along the narrow B9002 during the week with a further three on Saturdays.

But, the proposal proved to be quite controversial, with 45 letters of objection submitted to Aberdeenshire Council against the quarry.

The application went before the Marr area committee earlier today, after members visited the site itself last Wednesday.

Councillor Sarah Brown asked what general noise levels would be like on a daily basis, specifically around vehicles on the site.

Leiths planning manager Colin Ortlepp told members that there would be “fairly limited operations” at the quarry.

He explained that trucks would be fitted with white noise reverse alarms.

“It is deliberately designed to be less intrusive than noises you’d historically hear around a building site,” he explained.

Mr Ortlepp claimed that noise assessments showed there would be a limit of 45 decibels generated from the quarry.

This would mean a fridge and a heavy spell of rain would be louder.

He stated this figure was “as quiet an operation you’d imagine you’d get in terms of quarrying”.

Concerns were also raised about dust from the quarry site.

But, the planning boss tried to quell any fears by revealing that Leiths would use water to control dust from spreading, especially during any dry spells of weather.

Huntly councillor Gwyneth Petrie said it was a “really difficult” application, but she urged the committee to approve it – and did so “slightly reluctantly”.

“I absolutely get the concerns of residents who have raised those to us during this process,” she continued.

“Having been on the site, listened to planners and seen the recommendations that have to be implemented before the work can commence, I’m assured we can grant this one.”

Councillor Geva Blackett said the site visit was “extremely valuable” but also wanted to grant the quarry.

She added: “We are all sympathising with people in the area and that’s what has made it so difficult.

“But, the reasons for granting have been given by officers and I think we have no option really but to go with their recommendation on this.”

However, councillor Yi-Pei Chou Turvey wanted the plan to be refused.

She said the proposal had “so many red flags” and was concerned the narrow roads would not be able to cope with the large quarry trucks.

The Banchory and Mid Deeside member also voiced her deep concerns on nature and water sources in the area.

But following a vote, the quarry plan was approved by six votes to three.

Residents living nearby were quick to respond to the decision.

Andrew Foreman, owner of the A-listed Craig Castle, has pledged an “unwavering commitment” to protect the historic site and its “irreplaceable treasures”.

The businessman also stressed that he would not hesitate to take legal action if needed to ensure the castle and its surroundings are “protected from any threat”.

He said: “The protection of Craig Castle, its Ancient Woodland and nearby heritage sites is not just about preserving the past.

“It’s about securing a healthier, sustainable future for our communities and the environment.”

Mr Foreman hired a principal ecologist to consider the environmental impact the quarry could have on the area.

The ecologist claimed that the development could have “catastrophic detrimental impacts” on certain species, and could even lead to “local extinctions”.

“The potential risks outlined by our ecologist are not something I will take lightly,” Mr Foreman stated.

He added: “I promise to act swiftly, decisively, and in full partnership with the local community to ensure that this unique heritage is safeguarded for generations to come.”

Victoria Nunn watched the meeting with her husband and was “absolutely devastated” with the outcome.

The cancer survivor has spoken about how special the area was to her and her family.

“We’ve just had a brief discussion about what to do, whether to sell up, but we’ve only been here three years and moving my daughter is hugely traumatic for her,” she said.

“It makes you feel so incredibly helpless.”

She added: “I’m glad we fought it as much as we did but Aberdeenshire Council, Leiths and the councillors that voted for it should be ashamed of themselves.”


Do you want to respond to this article? If so, click here to submit your thoughts and they may be published in print.



This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies - Learn More