Home   News   National   Article

Parents of critically ill baby prepare for appeal after losing treatment fight


By PA News

Register for free to read more of the latest local news. It's easy and will only take a moment.



Click here to sign up to our free newsletters!

The parents of a critically ill baby are preparing for an appeal after losing a High Court fight.

A High Court judge recently ruled that doctors could lawfully limit the treatment they provide to seven-month-old Indi Gregory – against the wishes of her parents, Dean Gregory and Claire Staniforth, who are both in their 30s and from Ilkeston, Derbyshire.

Mr Justice Peel heard evidence about Indi’s condition at a private trial in the Family Division of the High Court, at the Royal Courts of Justice complex, in London.

Dean Gregory, the father of Indi Gregory, at the Royal Courts of Justice in central London (Victoria Jones/PA)
Dean Gregory, the father of Indi Gregory, at the Royal Courts of Justice in central London (Victoria Jones/PA)

The judge heard that Indi, who was born on February 24 2023, has mitochondrial disease, a genetic condition that saps energy, and is being treated at the Queen’s Medical Centre in Nottingham.

Specialists say she is dying and bosses at the hospital’s governing trust asked Mr Justice Peel to rule that doctors could lawfully limit treatment provided to her.

Indi’s parents are being supported by campaign group the Christian Legal Centre.

A spokesman for the centre said a Court of Appeal hearing was due to be staged in London on Monday October 23.

The Court of Appeal is set to rule on Indi Gregory’s case (Aaron Chown/PA)
The Court of Appeal is set to rule on Indi Gregory’s case (Aaron Chown/PA)

Barrister Emma Sutton KC, who led Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust’s legal team, told Mr Justice Peel that Indi was critically ill and had an exceptionally rare and devastating neurometabolic disorder.

She said the treatment Indi received caused pain and was futile.

Mr Gregory told Mr Justice Peel that his daughter had “proved everyone wrong” and needed “more time”.

Mr Justice Peel considered evidence behind closed doors but allowed journalists to attend the hearing and ruled that Indi, her parents and the hospital can be named in reports.

He ruled that medics treating Indi, and a guardian appointed to represent her interests, could not be named.

Do you want to respond to this article? If so, click here to submit your thoughts and they may be published in print.

Keep up-to-date with important news from your community, and access exclusive, subscriber only content online. Read a copy of your favourite newspaper on any device via the HNM App.

Learn more


This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies - Learn More